Jump to content

User talk:Bedivere

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bedivere!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]

NASA images

[edit]

Thanks for handling the undeletion request. {{flickr-unfree-but|{{tl|PD-NASA}}}} might be better suited though. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can correct them if you want @Cryptic-waveform. Have a good day Bedivere (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I actually did for one file (prior to the deletion/undeletion), but the template adds the file to Category:Flickr images reviewed by trusted users. I'm not a trusted reviewer so undid my change. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Títere detectado por Pato

[edit]

Hola: Cuenta expulsada de WP en español por títere de otra cuenta expulsada en Commons. No se verificó vía checkuser sino por Pato. Por favor, ¿podrías revisar sus contribuciones aquí? Algunas sólo son recortes de imágenes disponibles para su uso libre. Otras no, sino que son capturas de pantalla de programas de TV, entre otras. Muchas gracias. Saludos. Rastamby (talk) 02:24, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Borrado lo dudoso, bloqueado. Bedivere (talk) 02:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere:Buenas ,esta foto debería ser removida o quedarse?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Un viejo amigo...

[edit]

Hola Bedivere, espero tengas un buen inicio de semana. Tenemos nuevamente a Radalezama183, que insiste en subir logos de películas de Hollywood con licencia CC: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jorse García. Habrá que pasar rastrillo con lo que dejó. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 15:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hola estimado @Taichi, igualmente tengas buena semana. Estuve revisando las subidas del titiritero pero solo encontré una subida problemática, que borré. Creo que podrían borrarse las otras tratándose del usuario problemático que es pero son usadas en varias Wikipedias, por lo que sería bueno nominarlas a todas para borrado y ver qué se decide. Un abrazo. Bedivere (talk) 16:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Entiendo la situación, tocará al modo difícil, que esos logos de películas con licencia CC son definitivamente un golazo argumental. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Taichi claro, pero Como son relativamente simples pueden levantar ciertos resquemores. Puedes verlo en el mensaje que me han dejado abajo. No es que no quiera borrarlos, pero mejor hacerlo por el proceso largo Bedivere (talk) 19:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lo siento Bedivere, pero tenía que decirlo, es bastante claro que este usuario no nos está ayudando a detener al multicuentas aquí. Taichi (talk) 04:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't feel like "deleted per nomination" is a sufficient explanation. Can you cite any decision by a court that would show how that logo consists of something more than text effects that per the passage I quoted cannot be copyrighted in the U.S.? Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek the file was uploaded by a cross wiki troll Bedivere (talk) 19:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is Trolls Band Together anything real, and is the file something real, or did the troll make up any of it? Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Given your disagreement i've reopened the DR. @Ikan Kekek Bedivere (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's very considerate of you. I would support deletion if either the logo or the movie or whatever didn't actually exist.
Best,
Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ikan Kekek: Sorry, but I think you don't understand the context behind this. The master has evaded blocks for some years on both the English and Spanish Wikipedias. We, the local administrators are having a lot of trouble with this account, and what it is leaving on Commons invites the master to continue evading blocks. These positions that leave an open door are a soft form of collaborationism. I'm sorry, but I'm not one to keep quiet and I prefer to say it head on when faced with an annoyance. Your obstacles don't help us stop the sock master, that's a fact. Taichi (talk) 04:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As a bureaucrat/admin on Wikivoyage, I'm sympathetic to dealing with trolls and spammers, but where is there a Commons policy that apparently useful files that are widely in use can or should be deleted based on the identity of the uploader? There have previously been proposals to delete the uploads of inveterate sockpuppets that have been voted down and closed as not accepted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Admin's Barnstar
For helping solving the Grandmaster Huon COM:AN/U case. Thank you! TzarN64 (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Un caso a revisar

[edit]

Hola: muchas gracias por tu intervención del 7 de marzo (Títere detectado por pato). Este caso es más fácil, pues sólo subió un puñado de imágenes. Pero alguna de ellas como la de Jacobo Langsner me genera dudas. En unos días te pasaré un caso más complejo, para que lo revises con tiempo. Muchísimas gracias. Saludos. Rastamby (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, borré algunas fotos estimado. Bedivere (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere
Hello, you recently closed the discussion for my deletion request, I just want a sufficient reason as to why.

The reason you provided sort of insinuates that you think there is a COM:SCOPE issue regarding F10 when the image uploaded, but per the source, is in no way connected to me.

There's also the fact that you used the term "AI-assisted" when in the original DR, it has been established that the person who prompted the image is not an artist, he has no reason to edit the portrait that was generated. The only editing done was him cropping the screenshot to where it shows a preview of the generated image and me covering up the preview of one of many photos that was used to generate this image due to copyright reasons.

Finally, you called the picture a profile picture when, again, the subject depicted has never used this particular image as a profile picture. In fact the photo was never exported, the only publicly available version of this image is a screenshot of the software used, which has a massive circle in the middle. TansoShoshen (talk) 04:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should just accept that particular image is not getting undeleted, too. Have a good one. Bedivere (talk) 04:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help but feel like I'm getting dismissed here, I simply would like a reason as to why the discussion was closed when it was. TansoShoshen (talk) 04:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet

[edit]

By the way, if you have some time, it looks like Erika YQ is a suckpuppet of David_C._S., as the uploads of the user are the same as the one as the blocked one and they were used by him in the Spanish Wikipedia after their upload here.Freddy eduardo (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Freddy eduardo bloqueado y etiquetado Bedivere (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Realmente estoy sorprendido por la escala de disrupción que ha creado este usuario. En algunos casos ha resubido archivos con los mismos nombres y mismos contenidos, como es el caso de Jaime Roldós. Creo que amerita solicitar su expulsión global, ¿qué opinas @Taichi: ? --Bedivere (talk) 06:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He hecho una solicitud en Meta [7] @Freddy eduardo: @Taichi: Bedivere (talk) 06:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Buenas Bedivere y Freddy eduardo: de mi parte no tengo objeciones, analizaré el comportamiento editorial de estas cuentas y tomo acción. Taichi (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Otro caso más

[edit]

Hola: de nuevo por aquí abusando de tu paciencia y de tu tiempo. ¿Puede que haya casos de license laundering via Flicr aquím entre otros casos? Gracias por darle un vistazo. Saludos. Rastamby (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No parecen ser problemáticas las subidas de esa cuenta Bedivere (talk) 04:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iñazio Irizar

[edit]

Hola Bedivere, consulto con este caso, al parecer ha subido numerosas fotos en Commons. Puede que algunas fotos sí sean tomadas por él pero hay muchas otras que se ven claramente uue no. Lleva bastantes avisos y no hallo alguna forma de que se detenga. Te aviso que está expulsado de la Wikipedia en español por su comportamiento. Taichi (talk) 06:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hola @Taichi lo he bloqueado indefinidamente. Sus archivos los he nominado para borrado Bedivere (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Falsche Anschuldigung COPYVIO

[edit]

COM:AN/U

[edit]

العربية  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Nederlands  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per my response on their talk page and the thread, this is very clearly a misunderstanding Bedivere (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problemas con el archivo File:Cobreloa 1977 1.jpg

[edit]

Hola @Bedivere, Hace aproximadamente menos de un día, el archivo Cobreloa 1977 1.jpg fue eliminado de Wikicommons, por el usuario llamado @Carlos yo, el argumento que agregó el usuario fue un archivo de prensa del año 2022 de la editorial Calama en Línea, yo le argumenté en su página de discusión que el archivo que fue subido a wikicommons fue en el año 2014, y le expresé que su argumento no era lo suficiente para borrar el archivo y que si pudiera explicar con más detalles sobre su decisión, a lo que no existió interacción.

El usuario usualmente no contesta a las apelaciones a sus decisiones y hace complejo la democratización, o bien que existe un debate sobre sus decisiones. Acudo a usted para ver si existe si hay una posibilidad de ver si el archivo puede ser recuperado, o bien encontrar el argumento necesario para su eliminación. ¡Muchas gracias! Andre el gigante (talk) 21:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hola @Andre el gigante El logo de Cobreloa lamentablemente no puede hospedarse acá por estar protegido por derechos de autor. Ese es el motivo de borrado. Bedivere (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Haciendo la descripción de la fotografía es(era) básicamente el plantel de Cobreloa de 1977 haciendo la formación protocolar de formación de 11 jugadores, no es el escudo(logo) de Cobreloa.
Ahora observando, borraron por completo las fotografías de ese usuario. ¿Puedo preguntar por qué?
¡Gracias! Andre el gigante (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tienes razón, la imagen no era el escudo sino la de un plantel. La verdad es que este usuario tenía varias otras fotografías, que decía que eran de su autoría, pero que aparecen en distintos portales (así pude acreditarlo). En consecuencia, fueron borradas. Bedivere (talk) 21:49, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Si tu tienes pruebas de que la fotografía Cobreloa 1977 1.jpg y otras verdaderamente eran del usuario que las subió, puedes entregarlas y con gusto las restauro. Sin eso, no será posible. Bedivere (talk) 21:49, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, eran claramente fotografías de una publicación, y no de autoría del autor, tal y cual como las otras borradas, y no cumplen con la ley chilena de derechos de autor. Saludos. Carlos yo (Discusión) 21:56, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
El problema para mi es la argumentación que se usa para defender el borrado, aún no se me responde el porqué se usa una autoría del año que se registra en el año 2022, para determinar la eliminación de una fotografía que se subió el año 2014. Ahora si usted tiene todas las autorías originales con sus respectiva referencia y editoriales dueñas de las fotos originales, sería suficiente para mí para dejar de lado el asunto. Pero considero injusto que se use un criterio así para determinar el borrado de un archivo. Ahora, si saben algo que yo no sepa, con gusto tendré que aceptar el termino de ésta discusión. Yo se que las presunciones están fuera de lugar, pero el usuario se llama similar como el jugador de Cobreloa Gustavo Cuello, y puede que esas fotografías sean de su autoría y no se le ha dado ese derecho. Saludos. Andre el gigante (talk) 22:13, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Commons is not the place to support your political initiatives" overrides COM:INUSE?

[edit]

Do you really think File:Kurdistan LGBT pride flag.png should be deleted because it reflects a political agenda, when it's in use in 7 Wikipedia articles? I don't think COM:INUSE means anything if files in use can be deleted because of the identity or actions of the uploader or because someone disapproves of their political agenda, and I'm also confused about the current status of the file. Some clarification of all of this would be appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I found the relevant Requests for undeletion thread. However, it made me even more concerned about your lack of commitment to respecting the autonomy of sister sites, and that might require a wider discussion in the future. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:28, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek I'm sorry my point of view was not correctly expressed. I am fine with whatever outcome that undeletion request has Bedivere (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I felt like your point of view was expressed clearly, and you are certainly not alone among admins in not taking COM:INUSE to mean that Commons should not delete files that are in use for inaccuracy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffswald

[edit]

Buenas Bedivere, primero que nada espero estés bien. Tengo este caso que ya sinceramente el usuario sigue subiendo imágenes tomadas de otra parte y no da atribución alguna, como he ido marcando fotos que subió de Facebook, ahora sube escudos que claramente se nota que no las creó él. Ya le mandé avisos. Por otra parte, se me hace alguien familiar que curiosamente hace un tiempo pidió desvanecer su cuenta. En fin. Taichi (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hola @Taichi, lo veré, probablemente lo bloquearé. Bedivere (talk) 20:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]