Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice! You somehow has given it the look of an ink drawing with watercolor rendering. --Cart (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 05:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on an overgrown heathland in mild evening light.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 02:59:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A well balanced composition that highlights the striking blue windows as a focal point. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Bland building, but the 'Hopper-ish' composition makes it work. --Cart (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 19:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice architecture but the harsh midday light doesn't help to distinguish the roof and the ground floor -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, I've tried to soften the light and reduce the shadows a little. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 17:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info created & uploaded by Dipu ME-12 – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very good moment but not sharp enough IMO. Sorry--Ermell (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 10:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
Info created & uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment FP Gallery can be specify with Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves). ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but in my opinion oversharpened which I struggle to overlook at this relatively low resolution Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 00:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Icteridae_(Icterids)
Info Common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), a kind of blackbird. I like that this shot captures some of its feathers' iridescence. Fun fact: a group of grackle sis called a "plague". :) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful bird and great compo with the helpful twig matching the shapes of the bird. --Cart (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Laridae (Gulls, terns and skimmers)
Info created by Princepauljoy – uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a bit noisy but still a spectacular capture Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, too noisy and oversharpened for my taste. The scene itself though is fantastic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Imho, the bokeh doesn't look entirely natural. Nevertheless, the scenery is magnificent, a fortunate moment to have captured in a photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 17:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala, an Indian State. In this photo documented live performance of a Theyyam.
- All by --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Please, per the rules, could you write a good description in the
|description =
box on the file page. This is so that people searching for photos can find it easier, and so all of us living outside Kerala can have a better understanding about what the photo depicts. Like who is the dancer supposed to be, are there any specific meanings for the colors and different items on the costume, are the dancers men or female, when and for how long is the dance/celebration. We foreigners would love to hear about such things. ;) Thank you. --Cart (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2025 (UTC)- Done --Shagil Kannur (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you. Striking image and interesting description. Information about an image always makes it more valuable. --Cart (talk) 09:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Done --Shagil Kannur (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive pose, striking and colorful composition. Thank you very much for the detailed description. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 12:37:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I like it --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Motif, sharpness, resolution, colors and light are convincing. --Milseburg (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Milseburg. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Cmao20--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure what you meant to say here Shagil Kannur, was this intended to be a vote? Cmao20 (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Mobile editing error. Sorry for this time. Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure what you meant to say here Shagil Kannur, was this intended to be a vote? Cmao20 (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 11:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Bread
Info Plain vanilla muffin, newly baked and photographed on crumpled baking paper. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Simple, golden brown, fragrant - you can almost smell the vanilla. A feast for the eyes, but sadly not for my taste buds! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- If you're ever in the neighborhood, I'll make you some. :) I'm so very glad you are well enough to participate here again! You've been missed. --Cart (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, that sounds amazing! Thank you so much! I'm doing my best - pain is a stubborn companion, but good company (and the thought of vanilla muffins) helps :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Pleasant and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 12:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Appetizing and atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment This looks delicious, but I don't like the background paper. Yann (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- When you bake muffins like this, there is always a risk that one or some of them will tip a bit and spill onto the sheet pan. To prevent the messy burning and the following cleaning, a baking paper is often used to cover the pan. It can be re-used between the batches even if it's wrinkled and slightly burned. I liked the texture of it, so I included it. More interesting than a plain flat surface to me, but that's a matter of taste. --Cart (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support There is like a yellow cast in my view, and I think the light could have been better with limited shadow in the foreground. I also share Yann's view on the paper background. However, the composition is fine and it's an appetizing FPC of food -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 05:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info oak-apple still attached to an oak leaf, sunk in a carpet of leaves under tall trees. Focus stack of 33 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Famberhorst: , please, check the contour of the little water layer below the fungus. There is a cloning effect on its right-hand side end. --Harlock81 (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Done @Harlock81: If I understand the place correctly, the error has been corrected. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it was there.
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it was there.
Support --Cart (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting photo subject. Thanks for the retouching! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Another good focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 02:03:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I quite like the choice to have a vertical composition here, it's brave and helps highlight the layers in the waves and the rocks. But personally I can't see enough outstanding in terms of motif, light (which is quite harsh) or quality to make this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It lacks wow in my view, and I don't like the composition with tight crop bottom and top. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 01:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Adolphe Jean-Baptiste Bayot after Carl Nebel, restored, uploaded, ans nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice view of the Zócalo with the Cathedral. – Aristeas (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 11:24:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info The roofed section with shop signs of Fredsgatan, a prestigious shopping street in Gothenburg, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry for the perspective at first sight. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Perspective is intentional for a dynamic impression. It is corrected based on the opening at the end of the arcade, which is horisontal and straight. Not all architecture photos need to follow the "FP church aisle perspective". --Cart (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but I agree with Moheen. It's directly visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Of course it's visible when it's intentional. If you don't like it, that's fine, but it's not something that accidentally happened to the photo or something I forgot to fix. The whole idea here is to play with the strong lines in the scene, treating it as something almost abstract. --Cart (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a matter of taste. For me the dynamic impression is successful.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It works also for me. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment
I wold clean CA, anoted. Picture is not so bad.--Mile (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Fixed Thanks for the tip! Talk about having a blind spot in your own photo. :) --Cart (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The architectural arrangement and perspective lends a pleasing depth and draws the eye into the distance. In addition, the interplay of light and shadow adds dynamism to the scene and, for me personally, a sense of clarity and structure. The mentioned CA's are not prominently visible, but can be removed (especially on the Junkyard clothing store logo). -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Let's see. Good aperture, quality fine, and something different. One out of "normal". --Mile (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Light is well handled but the content with commercial signs is uninteresting in my subjective view, sorry (no wow) and I don't like the angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 08:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Nice and appealing composition but not quite the quality you'd expect from a panorama. The structures and rocks work but the greenery looks very "Minecraft-y". --Cart (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I think the green looks something like this in January.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose, too low-quality. The detail is lost at high magnification. JayCubby (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support weakish because the details at full size are not that good but I love the colours and the panoramic composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Beautiful colours and arrangement, but the light is a bit unfortunate, making the buildings look rather flat and overexposed, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 02:34:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Scolopacidae_(Typical_Waders)
Info American woodcock (Scolopax minor), a plump, goofy shorebird of the forest floor that dances back and forth to search for worms in the ground. Typically very skittish and often challenging to find, for some reason they really like this one urban park in Manhattan, with a couple turning up each year. Makes it one of the few places where you can actually get a reasonably close shot. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent capture. The birds were on that land long before NY was built, glad to hear that some are not giving up their claim. ;-) --Cart (talk) 10:46, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Good picture of a bird in its environment Cmao20 (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 02:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice and calm enough, but the foreground looks a bit overexposed and even a minimalistic beach FP needs some element that captures your attention and makes it stand out among all other beaches, but I can't see that here. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 10:51, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The overexposed foreground is for me the main problem of the picture, sorry. --Harlock81 ( talk) 19:30, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Harlock81 -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 20:57:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Crocodylidae (Crocodiles)
Info Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus), Masai Mara, Kenya. This species is widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa and generally, the adult male Nile crocodile is between 3.5 and 5 m (11 ft 6 in and 16 ft 5 in) in length and weighs 225 to 750 kg (496 to 1,653 lb). Nile crocodiles are very aggressive and opportunistic apex predators, that are capable of taking almost any animal within their range. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support This one looks very smug about being an apex predator. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support To me he looks terrifying.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Were you close, or did you use "just" a good photographic objective? Of course, I'm joking. I agree with Famberhorst about the frightening look of the crocodile, albeit asleep. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:49, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Huge wow and superb quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Cart. (The comparison with the smile of some contemporary political predators is left as an exercise to the reader.) – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light, eye-catching close-up and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 21:54:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Azimronnie – uploaded by Azimronnie – nominated by Myrealnamm -- Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support At first glance, I didn't understand that they are walking in the water. Interesting subject. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:44, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support interesting --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, nice find, thank you for the nomination! – Aristeas (talk) 19:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 20:23:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Groups
Info created by Eugène Delacroix / Louvre Museum, uploaded by Shonagon nominated by Yann
Info Liberty Leading the People is one of the most famous French painting. It has influenced many people, including Victor Hugo and Bartholdi for the Statue of Liberty. It has also always been controversial, partly due to the representation of bare-breasted woman, and partly due to violence atmosphere of the scene.
Support Very high resolution, reproduction after a recent restoration. The difference with earlier copies is amazing. -- Yann (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good. Always feels odd to see an artwork you're so used to seeing, after a restoration. --Cart (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Through the depiction of idealism and realism, we are reminded of how far we should not go to realize ideals. Iconic masterpiece, excellent restoration. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Msb (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart and Radomianin. At the first glance the restored colours are surprising, but they make sense: seems that Delacroix wanted the entire painting to be dominated by the French national colors. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:28, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 19:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info created by A S M Jobaer – uploaded by A S M Jobaer – nominated by A S M Jobaer -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Please make sure that the gallery links work and goes to the right place, when you create a nomination. I have fixed this for you now, but you need to do that in the future. --Cart (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- I am new here and I really don't know how to edit these kind of posts. If you help me I will edit more carefully and better than before A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- You edit by clicking on the "edit" at the top of the nomination page and then follow the instruction that appear in the editing window. You can also read how to make these the correct way on the COM:FPC page. It has rules and instructions. Good luck now! --Cart (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Delicious fruit but awkward composition in my view. Out of focus ginger and distracting corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good-looking berries, but the whole composition is too messy for me. --Cart (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like the messy background with all the berry smears. The motif has potential but the image in general is not FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 17:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Asia
Info created by はにしな – uploaded by はにしな – nominated by Halowand -- Halowand (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Halowand (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:17:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Beach crossing De Kerf in the Schoorl dunes. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Amazing landscape, but the image is too blurry, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It looks sharp to me, and don't forget it's 36 megapixels Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Yes, it could use a bit more sharpness and contrast, but it's also extremely beautiful. As lovely as beach dunes are, they are also tricky to work into a good compo, so well done for this. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support very nice mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and mood. In places like these dunes it’s often difficult to find a typical view which condenses the essence of the landscape in a single image; here this has been achieved. – Aristeas (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Crop is too large, in my opinion. The high level of blur of the foreground is distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but not sufficient depth of field for me and the large amount of blurry foreground is distracting, good butterfly pic nevertheless but a little short of some recent ones we've seen at FPC Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:19:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Rusho127 – uploaded by Rusho127 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice capture. --Mile (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition--Anitava Roy (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:22, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive uniformity and a stunning array of colors. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:48, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Tanvir Rahat (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Tolles Foto. Die gleichmäßigen Formen, die Symmetrie und die verschiedenen Farben entzücken das Auge --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty neat, wouldn't be surprised to see this do well at POTY Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support An extra ordinary, stunning image. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin and PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Awesome patchwork and pixelation effect. Great to look at full size. Also per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support One of the best drone images I've seen! -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unexceptional mountain image, in my view. Harsh shadows, hazy background and dull light. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment The landscape is awesome, but perhaps the photo would benefit from a little more light and a square crop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.carter (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --imehling (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks! For me this brings out the layers in the scene better and the trees sits more balanced in the composition. --Cart (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Dramatic and satisfying composition for me despite edge sharpness being only OK Cmao20 (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support For the new version.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive landscape in my eyes – with the distinctive trees on the steep rock and the rising clouds it reminds me of Chinese landscape paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Mahinur11 – uploaded by Mahinur11 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Editing quality could be better, but it's striking, unusual motif that makes you happy to view. I also like that your nominations have good descriptions and categories, that makes it easier for users who are searching for specific photos to find these. --Cart (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think it is oversaturated (see the woman's face). I would support with less saturation. Yann (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Any chance of fixing this Kaim Amin? --Cart (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, I noticed the oversaturation too. I'll try to upload a fixed image. Kaim (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose until it is fixed. Yann (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, I noticed the oversaturation too. I'll try to upload a fixed image. Kaim (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Any chance of fixing this Kaim Amin? --Cart (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Somehow. Crop could be better, to put her head on up-left third, or , to remove sand border on both sides - crop or strecth size. --Mile (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC) p.S. Here, i would try this option too. @Kaim Amin
Weak support Per Cart --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose in its current form. Mile's crop is definitely superior, and the saturation as pointed by Yann has also not been fixed. A renaming is also required for a more descriptive title. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Too many issues as such, would support if all fixes are implemented. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Interesting but could be improved, per above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2025 at 13:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info No FPs of this place. Just great light and satisfying composition. created by I.Mahesh – uploaded by I.Mahesh – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment It's really great that you keep finding photos from new places and new photographers, but in doing so, would you please see to it that the photos are accompanied with good descriptions and categorizations. This nomination is to the 'Boats' gallery without any mention of the boats on the file page. Please remember that (per the rules) documentation is just as important for an FP as the photo. I'm asking you kindly. --Cart (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you I.Mahesh for fixing this! :-) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think I do generally do this, but yes, sure, you’re right Cmao20 (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you I.Mahesh for fixing this! :-) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice distribution of the various objects in the photo for me. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2025 at 10:30:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info Two Chestnut-tailed Starling (Sturnia malabarica), created and uploaded by Princepauljoy, Radomianin helped with editing after this featured picture candidates discussion – nominated by আফতাবুজ্জামান -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:23, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support FP now, this is miles better Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support An exquisitely beautiful motif, captured at the perfect moment. My gratitude extends to the photographer and to the nominator for making a second attempt to nominate this gem. The effort invested in the reprocessing was indeed worthwhile. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support magnificent --Stepro (talk) 20:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:29, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 10:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin, and with many thanks to the latter for the editing! – Aristeas (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2025 at 11:57:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Marine
Info created by Hugo Graf, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Olivier LPB (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very interesting Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support and thank you. Don't know why I didn't nominate this at the time, but I used to be a lot less organised about what had and hadn't been nominated on Commons, and the two nomination limit sometimes meant I'd forget about things. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 19:02:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral I would expect more details and more sharpness. The composition is quite good, very good. --XRay 💬 11:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Nice view, maybe could do with a little more space on the left hand side to complete the curve of the shoreline Cmao20 (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed, although the sunlight coming from behind the camera lights up the right side nicely. Tsays22 (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment I'm a little bit bothered by the magenta cast in the photo, it's not much but looking at the clouds it's there. --Cart (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2025 at 14:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
Info probably created by the Webster Brothers – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 24 Mar → Sat 29 Mar Tue 25 Mar → Sun 30 Mar Wed 26 Mar → Mon 31 Mar Thu 27 Mar → Tue 01 Apr Fri 28 Mar → Wed 02 Apr Sat 29 Mar → Thu 03 Apr
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 20 Mar → Sat 29 Mar Fri 21 Mar → Sun 30 Mar Sat 22 Mar → Mon 31 Mar Sun 23 Mar → Tue 01 Apr Mon 24 Mar → Wed 02 Apr Tue 25 Mar → Thu 03 Apr Wed 26 Mar → Fri 04 Apr Thu 27 Mar → Sat 05 Apr Fri 28 Mar → Sun 06 Apr Sat 29 Mar → Mon 07 Apr
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.