Commons:Administrators
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

This page explains the role of administrators (sometimes called admins or sysops) on Wikimedia Commons. Note that details of the role, and the way in which administrators are appointed, may differ from other sites.
If you want to request administrator help, please post at Administrators' noticeboard.
There are currently 177 administrators on Commons.
What is an administrator?
Administrators as of March 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 177
If 177 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Technical
Administrators are users with the technical ability on Wikimedia Commons to:
- delete and undelete images and other uploaded files, and to view and restore deleted versions
- delete and undelete pages, and to view and restore deleted revisions
- protect and unprotect pages, and to edit admin-protected pages
- block and unblock users, individual IP addresses and IP address ranges
- edit less-restricted interface messages (see also Commons:Interface administrators)
- rename files
- add and remove user groups
- configure Upload Wizard campaigns
- delete and undelete specific log entries and revisions of pages
- import pages from other wikis
- merge the history of pages
- modify abuse filters
- not create redirects from source pages when moving pages
- override the spoofing checks and title or username blacklist
- send a message to multiple users at once (massmessage)
- use higher limits in API queries
These are collectively known as the admin tools.
Community role
Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community who have taken on additional maintenance work and have been entrusted with the admin tools by public consensus/vote. Different admins have different areas of interest and expertise, but typical admin tasks include determining and closing deletion requests, deleting copyright violations, undeleting files where necessary, protecting Commons against vandalism, and working on templates and other protected pages. Of course, some of these tasks can be done by non-admins as well.
Administrators are expected to understand the goals of this project, and be prepared to work constructively with others towards those ends. Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate, respect community consensus.
Apart from roles which require use of the admin tools, administrators have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Some admins may become more influential, not due to their position as such, but from the personal trust they may have gained from the community.
Suggestions for administrators
Please read Commons:Guide to adminship.
Removal of administrator rights
Under the de-admin policy, administrator rights may be revoked due to inactivity or misuse of sysop tools. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Apply to become an administrator
All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.
First, go to Commons:Administrators/Howto and read the information there. Then come back here and make your request in the section below.
- After clicking the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) to transclude it. Request a watchlist notice at MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, or edit MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice to put up one if you are an administrator.
- If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.
Use the box below, replacing Username with your username: |
Voting
Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable you give reasons for both Support and Oppose votes as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.
Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Bureaucrats may, at their discretion, extend the period of an RfA if they feel that it will be helpful in better determining community consensus.
Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However, such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.
Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Alachuckthebuck (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 18:05, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I'm Alachuckthebuck, A license reviewer and antivandalism user. I've been helping out at FILTERT and assisting when I can, but have been running into issues where neither Jeff G or myself can see the filter entries due to private filters. In addition to the visibility issue, a large amount of our filters need to be rewritten for temporary accounts, and I want to help start that effort. In addition, I'm planning on helping at RFR, mainly with autopatrol, patroller, and rollback, as those are the areas I'm familiar with. I also intend to continue closing LR requests. In addition, I also run Chuckbot, the mass rollback bot used to clean up FlickrReviewer2's bugged reviews in January. All feedback is appreciated. If you have left feedback on my talk page, I've read it, and tried my best to implement it.
I'm familiar with commons policies and have a general knowlege of global copyright, and a very good knowlege of US/UK copyright, and will consult with other admins on any action I'm nor 100% sure on. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 18:05, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Active contributor, understands licensing and good with fighting vandalism and sockpuppetry. And, we still need more admins. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 18:36, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
looks like a great editor from what I have seen in their contributions; going to read more of their contributions to check if there are any issues, but very much leaning support for now. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Neutral for now-
Weak oppose per Bedivere- Chuck's a great editor who can become a great admin once they show improvements. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Bastique. Yann (talk) 18:55, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support why not Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with HouseBlaster below – Chuck still has my confidence. Queen of Hearts (talk) 06:33, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --TenWhile6 20:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Support per Bastique.
Weak oppose per Bedivere — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I've found Chuck to be too eager to jump in and help, even when they're out of their depth. They don't know what they don't know, and that means that they have a tendency to confidently give incorrect advice. When they're reporting an issue, it's generally a good report (though there are exceptions). However, when they are responding to other people's questions or jumping into ongoing discussions, it's a dice roll whether their participation is a net positive or a net negative. Knowing the limits of your expertise, and when to leave an issue to other people better prepared to deal with it, is a vital skill for anyone that wants to work in deletions that Chuck still needs to develop. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy: Could you provide some examples where Alachuckthebuck has jumped in unhelpfully in your opinion? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:46, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support. Elli (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I'm of the same opinion of TSC. It's not a great deal, though, as I think they can still show some improvements and renominate themselves or have someone reapply you in some more months. --Bedivere (talk) 01:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Is Chuck perfect? No. Is anyone perfect? Emphatically not. It is always a good idea to be careful when diving into new areas, but I fully trust Chuck to be careful when diving into the role of mopping. Best, HouseBlaster (talk) 02:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose.--RoyZuo (talk) 07:32, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Per Bedivere. Alachuckthebuck generally seems like a nice person. They can sometimes make less then helpful contributions to conversations though. I fully support them becoming an admin if, or when, they improve on it though. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose This editor needs a lot more work to be an admin. Not even a year ago, they marked a picture I took of a known figure with my own camera as copyrighted. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 07:47, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- please give link, thank you. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 09:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Modern primat: Special:Diff/849027156/870674833. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- please give link, thank you. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 09:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Per Bedivere. --Mateus2019 (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 09:29, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Md Mobashir Hossain (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm gonna have to go with a
weak not yet per Bedivere, though I do think this is easily fixable if things change by the end of this year. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- @SHB2000: Please check your work. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose, I think that Chuck should gain more experience about adminship. In my opinion Chuck’s adminship request is early. After gaining experience and working more, I will support Chuck’s adminship. --Kadı Message 11:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- My impression is that this user needs more experience before they can be trusted with admin bit. (Before you ask: sorry, I am not allowed to disclose how I got the "impression".) — regards, Revi 11:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Revi C., Can you please email me privately about this "impression"? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Right now, the answer have to be no, but I think I'll be able to do that by end of next week. (Tentative; no guarantee) — regards, Revi 18:58, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Revi C., Can you please email me privately about this "impression"? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Can you explain the block in 2024? JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 20:14, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- My block was a 3 day edit warring block over a speedy notice on a Vogue Taiwan image. That block was 100% my fault, and I should have just put a DR notice rather than reverting it. Here's the relevant thread regarding the block and my response. I'm happy to answer any further questions or clarify any other points or details about the block. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Tasks