Commons:Categories for discussion/Archive/2022/06
{{TOO}} is deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:TOO. So this page is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Wrong combination: Theopompula is a synonym of Humbertiella, and there is no H. ophthalmica Brunei (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Height Error. Tuntex Sky Tower is 378 m. So please delete this category. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I confused it. Tuntex Sky Tower except an antenna is 347.5 m. So
I withdraw my nomination. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done: Withdrawn by the nominator himself (non-admin closure) Ox1997cow (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Height Error. Tuntex Sky Tower is 378 m. So please delete this category. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I confused it. Tuntex Sky Tower except an antenna is 347.5 m. So I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done: Withdrawn by the nominator himself (non-admin closure) Ox1997cow (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
sostanza data ai soldati Americani nella guerra in Vietnam , era vietata in alcuni paesi Eu. per presunti danni cerebrali . 91.187.201.58 16:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done: Nothing to do. --Achim55 (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Category is empty and should therefore be deleted. – Doc Taxon 
Disk. • 23:28, 1. Jun 2022 (UTC) 23:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Closing: category has been deleted. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
court sessions 71.210.112.189 02:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep I see no problem with the category, and I can't tell what "court sessions" is intended to convey here. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done: nothing to do. --Achim55 (talk) 10:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
advertisment Tagishsimon (talk) 21:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- At least delete the text. A category shouldn't have that much text anyway. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Rename to Category:Pinkwashing (LGBT) to match with en:Pinkwashing (LGBT) and avoid confusion with en:Pinkwashing (breast cancer). -- Themightyquill (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with the applicant's reasoning. Support --MKBler (talk) 18:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Moved to Category:Pinkwashing (LGBT). -- Themightyquill (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
He's dead and no freely licensed photos of him exist. I don't see why we need a category. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Should be deleted, created in error Vzeebjtf (talk) 03:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Propose move to "Unofficial road signs of Switzerland". Current name doesn't follow common naming convention for road sign categories, it can also simplified to a shorter name. (I moved a file out of this category, since I was preparing to propose deletion, however I reconsidered. There's at least two files that could go into this category.)The Navigators (talk) 00:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
No comments or objections were made. Moved to Category:Unofficial road signs of Switzerland.--The Navigators (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
deletion request Omega lux (talk) 07:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Do we need this subcategory? Most photographs show (also) other things than the covered bridge (and another larger "historical photographs" category could be used) and Category:Gedecktes Brüggli (Zürich) is currently empty. As the bridge no longer exists, it's unlikely to have recent views to come. Enhancing999 (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Parpan05 what do you think of it? --- Enhancing999 (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think a category with only historical photos can be useful – opposed to historical drawings. But if you prefer to put all the images in a single category (Category:Gedecktes Brüggli (Zürich)), that would be ok too.--Parpan05 (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Parpan05 I'd rather leave them all in a single category. At Category:Kapellbrücke such subcategories could work. Enhancing999 (talk) 13:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok for me. Parpan05 (talk) Parpan05 (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I moved the images (also the second category). Enhancing999 (talk) 14:53, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok for me. Parpan05 (talk) Parpan05 (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Parpan05 I'd rather leave them all in a single category. At Category:Kapellbrücke such subcategories could work. Enhancing999 (talk) 13:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think a category with only historical photos can be useful – opposed to historical drawings. But if you prefer to put all the images in a single category (Category:Gedecktes Brüggli (Zürich)), that would be ok too.--Parpan05 (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Need to delete that category. Everything is just blank. 149.7.35.210 17:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done: Kept: Maintenance category. --Achim55 (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Empty category for a nonexistent and dangerous practice Dronebogus (talk) 21:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This and a few other categories include mostly that is called "remote view" at Category:Remote views of bridges. One could either rename them accordingly or merely merge the content to the parent category and delete these (preferred by me). Other similar categories are:
- Category:Views of pont du Gottéron (Fribourg)
- Category:Views of pont de Berne (Fribourg)
- Category:Views of pont de la Poya
Same should be done for these. -- Enhancing999 (talk) 06:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Why would you like name "remote views" what can simply be named "views"? I'm certainly so naive.... User:Jeanhousen===
- Wouldn't "View of" be any type of view, not just remote views? So essentially most photos would end up in there. I think it helps picking names that describe what should be in there. Enhancing999 (talk) 07:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Would you like to add something? Otherwise I will go ahead and merge them. @Jeanhousen -- Enhancing999 (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok then. I moved some files to Category:Remote views of pont de Berne (Fribourg) and merged the other categories with its parent. Enhancing999 (talk) 17:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
What even is this? Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Done: Deleted, empty and quite irregular category name as well. --rimshottalk 21:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Apparent test page. PhilKnight (talk) 11:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Done: As per nom. --rimshottalk 22:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Category created to contain one selfie of a Commons user. This doesn't seem to fit into the Category:Commons users hierarchy, suggest deletion. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- It would probably be better to nominate the file for deletion first per Commons:Category inclusion criteria since the category can be deleted straight away if emptied from deletion. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- The user seems to be a genuine contributor, so I'm not sure there's a compelling reason to delete his selfie. It just belongs on his user page rather than in a category named after him. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- I added {{User category}}. Could be kept this way as a compromise I think. --Achim55 (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- The user seems to be a genuine contributor, so I'm not sure there's a compelling reason to delete his selfie. It just belongs on his user page rather than in a category named after him. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Commons and Wikidata are used for self-promotion. His self-created entry (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q112822541) remembers a CV with the description I am thierno Ismaël jallow, a graduate in digital technology transmission and a lover of football and entertainment research excursions (transalation from french). Non-notable. His 2 selfies on Commons meet the guidelines for speedy deletion and have just been deleted. His wikidata entry is also up for deletion (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions).Nemracc (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Can anyone identify the purpose of this category? -- Themightyquill (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Going by the location data, these are apparently all taken from a Marsh Road, some of them showing houses on the road. Most of them are from Marsh Road, Cowes, Isle of Wight. At least File:Higham, UK - panoramio.jpg is from Marsh Road, Higham, Babergh. The Cowes pictures might get their own category, I suggest the Higham picture could just be moved to Category:Higham, Babergh, as we don't have a lot of pictures from there. --rimshottalk 21:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Images sorted accordingly. Category had no clear purpose, so deleted. -- Themightyquill (talk) 08:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Not sure what "by transition" should do. It isn't used elsewhere either and currently includes only Category:Bridge construction in Switzerland. This can be upmerged.
Category:Bridge elements in Switzerland had been included as a subcategory of Category:Bridge construction in Switzerland, but Category:Bridge elements in Switzerland generally just includes photos of specific parts of bridges, not particularly related to the construction process. Enhancing999 (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Given the lack of interested in the question, I remove it from its subcategory and add a deletion tag. Enhancing999 (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be preferable to categorized perspective views by topic rather than location? The location aspect is already covered otherviews. Enhancing999 (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Given the lack of interested in the question, I merge it with its parent and add a deletion tag. Enhancing999 (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
"Liturgical items" is an unique term. Category's members to be moved, e.g. to category:Liturgy in the Netherlands, or Category:Christian items in the Netherlands Estopedist1 (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, "Liturgical items" is a unique term that only is in use for the Netherlands. But how bad is that? Is it enough to delete this category (or give it a redirect, to two categories?)? I do not think so. It might be unique just because these items have not been categorized properly for other countries yet. "Liturgy" is not about items, but about events (see parent category); "Christian items" is too broad. This category is about just what is says: items that are used during liturgical ceremonies. Isn't that exactly what Commons promotes: to be as specific as possible? If you do not like the name and have a better one, we can discuss that. --JopkeB (talk) 11:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Since there was no reaction within a month, my conclusion is that this category may stay because it is about a useful concept. --JopkeB (talk) 03:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
This category may stay because it is about a useful concept. --JopkeB (talk) 03:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
{{FoP-Honduras}} is deleted. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
NoTOO Templates are deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NoTOO-China. So this category is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 23:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
category names should be in English Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist. -- Themightyquill (talk) 19:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Its title is Swedish for "Gods in Norse mythology", which duplicates Category:Norse deities. Its contents are two of the images from Category:Riksbyristningen, a particular depiction of two of the Norse gods that is a registered landmark. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
No opposition. Deleted. -- Themightyquill (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
This category was created in 2019. I moved the file occupying this category into Category:Saint Thomas the Apostle Church (Ann Arbor, Michigan), which was created in 2012 Nheyob (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Categories merged, but left as redirect. -- Themightyquill (talk) 18:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Propose to either redirect to Category:Adhesives or find a way to clearly define what makes a certain type of adhesive a "glue". There are no interwiki links for "glue": the english language Wikipedia treats it as a synonym for adhesive, and none of the other language versions seem to have a subtype of adhesive that corresponds to the English "glue" either. El Grafo (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
No opposition. Redirected to Category:Adhesives. -- Themightyquill (talk) 08:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ale%C5%A1ova_24_(Brno) Kudlav (talk) 10:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Willa Kranz is 4 years older, it can't be duplicate. Alešova 24 (Brno) is duplicate. --Bazi (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, Category:Alešova 24 (Brno) is trunk now without any content, is it possible to delete it? Or propose for deletion? A cannot see that option. Kudlav (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Redundant. Redirected Category:Alešova 24 (Brno) to Category:Villa Kranz. -- Themightyquill (talk) 08:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Chiedo rimozione per inserimento errato da me effettuato Walter Giannetti (talk) 08:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
This category is maybe empty. Heraldrist (talk) 00:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Duplicated category with Category:.KTW MacQtosh (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete: Typo in heading, correct is Category:Echeveria macdougallii Zenwort (talk) 09:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Category:Media with PD-Denmark50 but no explanation why the photograph is public domain in the United States - exempt
[edit]This seems to be an obsolete category from 2013 with no further reason to exist. And if we are going to have categories to ensure URAA compliance, it doesn't make sense to have a category for such a specific tag. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
@King of Hearts: Closed (no objections) Josh (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
IMHO the correct name would be Category:Crystal structures of vanadinite. Leyo 14:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Singular is correct in this case, because vanadinite only has one type of crystal structures. It's not the same like Category:Crystal structures of carbides, Category:Crystal structures of oxides and others. -- Ra'ike T C 09:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, Category:Crystal structure of vanadinite then. There is no good reason for capitalization. --Leyo 14:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- If you don't have a job, you get one... (Wer keine Arbeit hat, macht sich welche...). Have fun by moving of
- Category:Crystal structure of Althupite
- Category:Crystal structure of Kamchatkite
- Category:Crystal structure of Insizwaite
- Category:Crystal structure of Tremolite
- Category:Crystal structure of Schwertmannite
- Category:Crystal structure of Penroseite
- Category:Crystal structure of Pyrite
- Category:Crystal structure of Cobaltite
- Category:Crystal structure of Achávalite
- Category:Crystal structure of Breithauptite
- Category:Crystal structure of Seligmannite
- Category:Crystal structure of Weberite
- Category:Crystal structure of Pachnolite
- Category:Crystal structure of Montroydite
- Category:Crystal structure of Plattnerite
- Category:Crystal structure of Roaldite
- Category:Crystal structure of Brianite
- Category:Crystal structure of Shandite
- Category:Crystal structure of Cadmoindite
- Category:Crystal structure of Siegenite
- Category:Crystal structure of Balyakinite
- Category:Crystal structure of Hafon
- Category:Crystal structure of Vanuralite
- Category:Crystal structure of Nabokoite
- Category:Crystal structure of Fukuchilite
- Category:Crystal structure of Cooperite
- Category:Crystal structure of Vysotskite
- Category:Crystal structure of Shuangfengite
- Category:Crystal structure of Sudovikovite
- Category:Crystal structure of Melonite
- Category:Crystal structure of Beryl
- Category:Crystal structure of Adamsite-(Y)
- Category:Crystal structure of Aerinite
- Category:Crystal structure of Variscite
- Category:Crystal structure of Chabournéite
- Category:Crystal structure of Uraninite
- Category:Crystal structure of Cerussite
- Category:Crystal structure of Raspite
- Category:Crystal structure of Perovskite
- Category:Crystal structure of Novacekite
- Category:Crystal structure of Kleinite
- Category:Crystal structure of Greigite
- Category:Crystal structure of Huttonite
- Category:Crystal structure of Hydrokenomicrolite
- Category:Crystal structure of Miargyrite
- Category:Crystal structure of Hematite
- Category:Crystal structure of Cryolite
- Category:Crystal structure of Libethenite
- Category:Crystal structure of Mejillonesite
- Category:Crystal structure of Aerugite
- Category:Crystal structure of Alforsite
- Category:Crystal structure of Platinum
- Category:Crystal structure of Johnbaumite
- These categories have existed in this form for years and it didn't bother anyone. Why you now? But if you think it's worth the effort... -- Ra'ike T C 19:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- These categories might not have been visited by too many people. IMHO the capitalization of category names should be corrected, irrespective of the workload (that is not extremely thath anyway). --Leyo 09:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- If you don't have a job, you get one... (Wer keine Arbeit hat, macht sich welche...). Have fun by moving of
- Okay, Category:Crystal structure of vanadinite then. There is no good reason for capitalization. --Leyo 14:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, englisch wird mir jetzt zu anstrengend, daher kurz in deutsch. Ich halte die Großschreibung der Mineralnamen ehrlich gesagt nicht für einen Fehler. Es sind Eigennamen und die werden meines – zugegeben begrenzten Wissens – im Englischen auch groß geschrieben. Allerdings muss ich zugeben, dass bei meiner PetScan-Suche auch Kategorien wie Category:Crystal structure of anatase, Category:Crystal structure of brookite, Category:Crystal structure of chalcopyrite, Category:Crystal structure of cinnabar, Category:Crystal structure of crocoite, Category:Crystal structure of fluorite, Category:Crystal structure of liroconite, Category:Crystal structure of malachite, Category:Crystal structure of metacinnabar, Category:Crystal structure of orpiment, Category:Crystal structure of realgar, Category:Crystal structure of rutile, Category:Crystal structure of sphalerite, Category:Crystal structure of stibnite und Category:Crystal structure of wurtzite auftauchten, die von User:Benjah-bmm27 erzeugt wurden.
- Übrigens gibt es auch Kategorien, die tatsächlich im Plural stehen sollten wie Category:Crystal structure of iron (kann krz und kfz sein) und Category:Crystal structure of carbon (hex, kub,...).
- Langer Rede kurzer Sinn, ich persönlich halte die Großschreibung zwar für ok, aber ich hänge auch nicht auf Biegen und Brechen dran. Wenn Du Dir die Arbeit machen möchtest, die Kategorien und Bilder entsprechend zu verschieben, dann mach halt. -- Ra'ike T C 19:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Before starting this CfD, I checked in en:Vanadinite that the name is not capitalized (except at the beginning of sentences). I will now wait a little for potential other views. --Leyo 23:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Rename category to lowercase, in the form of Category:Crystal structure of Vanadinite --> Category:Crystal structure of vanadinite for all the categories listed above. In English, minerals are common nouns rather than proper nouns and are therefore not capitalized except at the start of a sentence. Retain singular instead of plural per Ra'ike. Marbletan (talk) 18:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
I moved all categories per the explanation provided by Marbletan. --Leyo 21:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm already not sure what Category:1 bridge would do, but why would we have subcategory tree for this? Enhancing999 (talk) 05:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep it's part of the whole category-tree, for example ...
- Category:Groups of 1
- Category:1 vehicle
- Category:1 organism
- Category:1 structure
- Category:1 bridge --> (keep) as all others with "1";
- (see Category:Bridges by quantity --> ... Category:1 bridge, Category:2 bridges, Category:3 bridges, Category:4 bridges, Category:5 bridges, ..., Category:Many bridges)
- Category:1 building
- Category:1 tunnel
- ...
- Category:Groups of 2
- Category:Groups of 3
- ...
- Category:Groups of 1
- Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 08:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- That may explain why there is Category:1 bridge, but the discussion here is about Category:1 bridge by country and its subcategories. Nothing in the above explains why you would need that. Enhancing999 (talk) 08:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: In 20+ years we have 80,000,000 pictures in Commons. In the last years, almost every person has a smartphone with camera, so the number of pictures will increase in the future. Expect the number of pictures only at the end of the 21st century... 1 billion?! So Category:1 bridge by country, 1/2/3 bridge/s by city/cities (of these countries) ... will give the space to sort these and future pictures. The Category-by-country-sorting is common for all topics where there are already many pictures in all countries or where many pictures can be expected in the future. My motto is better to create the correct sorting sooner than later. Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 09:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- That may explain why there is Category:1 bridge, but the discussion here is about Category:1 bridge by country and its subcategories. Nothing in the above explains why you would need that. Enhancing999 (talk) 08:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: By the way:
- Category:Groups of 1 by country
- Category:1 vehicle by country
- Category:1 organism by country
- Category:1 structure by country
- Category:1 bridge by country --> (keep) as all others with " by country"
- Category:1 building by country
- Category:1 tunnel by country
- ...
- Category:Groups of 2 by country
- Category:Groups of 3 by country
- ...
- Category:Groups of 1 by country
- Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 09:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think space is an issue, beyond that, you haven't explained why you consider that correct sorting.
- We already have "bridges by country", so we don't need "1 bridge by country".
- At least, this time, you added your keep vote to the correct category. It's possible that some of the other categories created empty aren't needed either, but that would be a different discussion. --- Enhancing999 (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think I explained it because there are countless pictures with 1 bridge. If one does not divide by country and other administrative units, the main categories will be hopelessly overcrowded. I don't understand what you want to improve. Abolishing this sorting would sooner or later hopelessly overcrowd the main categories.
- And no, the other categories aren't created empty as you suppose here. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 10:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: By the way:
- Keep I won't even comment on the content, but "by country" is a common way to avoid full categories. Like "by color", "by type", "by shape", ... --XRay 💬 13:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The main reasons have already been mentioned. It is absurd to take action against the entire category tree. --Geoprofi Lars (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment As mentioned before, most of the categories filled-in by the creator above aren't concerned and are different in nature. Enhancing999 (talk) 09:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's not true. the categories I mentioned as examples are all by quantity by country. you have to keep in mind that this discussion you have initiated here concerns the entire similar existing system. And your goals are not clear to anyone here. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 20:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to re-read your post from "08:26, 28 June 2022". Enhancing999 (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- You might re-read my post from "09:41", 28 June 2022. ... after you didn't seem to understand the first one and needed more detailed explanations with the addition "by country"... and you have not yet presented any meaningful arguments why this should be changed/deleted ... the "by country"-categories are commonly used in all other areas, the categorization "by country" - if there are several images per country or several images can be expected in the future - is usually. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- You created the whole category tree Category:Groups of 1 by country just recently. There has been no large discussion with a clear consensus about these categories, so it is perfectly fine to question whether we need this category tree as a whole at all. --PhiH (talk) 11:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- While categories for 2 can be useful, I still don't see it for "1 bridge by country".
- What do prolific contributors of bridge images think of it? @Jag9889, @Pechristener Enhancing999 (talk) 15:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Don't see any benefit by using this category, it's rather confusing and duplicate to me. Jag9889 (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is a benefit. It makes sense to separate the Category:Categories by quantity from 1, ... to many by country, because the main categories will fill up over time. Since there are several hundred countries, a categorization "by country" makes sense, otherwise there would be hundreds of entries in the main category. This is handled in every subject area of Commons to categorize "by country". It's the same here.
-- Triple C 85 | User talk | 13:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep anro (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is a benefit. It makes sense to separate the Category:Categories by quantity from 1, ... to many by country, because the main categories will fill up over time. Since there are several hundred countries, a categorization "by country" makes sense, otherwise there would be hundreds of entries in the main category. This is handled in every subject area of Commons to categorize "by country". It's the same here.
- Don't see any benefit by using this category, it's rather confusing and duplicate to me. Jag9889 (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to re-read your post from "08:26, 28 June 2022". Enhancing999 (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's not true. the categories I mentioned as examples are all by quantity by country. you have to keep in mind that this discussion you have initiated here concerns the entire similar existing system. And your goals are not clear to anyone here. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 20:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment can we avoid voting multiple times on random categories on this page? Enhancing999 (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep --W-R-Hesse-Fotos (talk) 17:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep --Laserlicht (talk) 22:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As others have pointed out, this category tree will eventually become almost a duplicate of categories such as Category:Bridges by country. Categories like these might make sense in contexts where mutiple objects of the same type are regularly depicted in one image, e. g. for animals. The vast majority of images with bridges have exactly one bridge as the primary object. I don't think that there will be many people looking for an image with exactly one bridge on it and won't be satisfied with images in the general categories. --PhiH (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Could not agree more, it just does not make any sense to add a Category by quantity for BRIDGES Jag9889 (talk) 15:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep While clearly some users see no benefit to this category structure, there are others who do find value in it. Since the structure complies with the basic principles for categories and a number of users value it, there is no reason left to delete it. Josh (talk) 05:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |  No consensus | |||
| Actions | none (stale discussion) | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
This category currently contains all sorts of chemical structures. I'd suggest to restrict its content to formulas that explain skeletal structures. The category might be moved to e.g. Category:Teaching illustrations of skeletal formulas (and become a subcategory of Category:Teaching illustrations of chemistry). Leyo 08:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Rename category . This category is currently misused to a certain extent. Many of the files in the category (File:Butansaeure.svg, for example) are not even skeletal formulas. If it were to include all skeletal formulas on Commons, it would contain tens of thousands of files. I don't see the point. Leyo's suggestion to focus the category and rename it to Category:Teaching illustrations of skeletal formulas looks like a good idea to me. Marbletan (talk) 15:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Rename category . I don't think a cat of "every image that is a en:Skeletal formula" is a useful one (Marbletan's comment about it being unwieldy). But ones that illustrate the meaning of this term as a Teaching illustrations... subcat sure sounds good. DMacks (talk) 09:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
@MB-one: You created this category. Any opposition to that suggestion? --Leyo 16:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Neutral no opposition from my side. MB-one (talk) 13:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Moved. --Leyo 20:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
"Extraterrestrial life" and "aliens" are synonymous terms, at least according to Wiktionary, which describes "alien" as "any life form of extraterrestrial or extradimensional origin". Because of this, it seems unnecessary to have both Category:Extraterrestrial life and Category:Aliens, as these two categories have essentially identical scope. I think one of these two categories should be redirected to the other. 46.132.191.251 16:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
It has now been over two months since I started this discussion. During that time, it has garnered little attention from other editors, so I am going to be bold and resolve this issue by myself. The term "alien" is unscientific and vague, as in addition to extraterrestrial life, it can also refer to introduced species and people residing in a foreign country. Therefore, I am going to turn Category:Aliens into a disambiguation that includes Category:Extraterrestrial life, Category:Introduced species and Category:Expatriates, and move all media from it into a more appropiate category (chiefly Category:Extraterrestrial life). 193.210.228.240 12:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
This category should be removed because it was created with the intent to mislead as none of the images placed here (File:Frédou - Etude pour le visage du Dauphin, père de Louis XVI - Versailles.jpg, File:Portrait of Giacomo Pes di Villamarina.png and File:Rosalba Carriera - Young Lady of the Le Blond Family - Gallerie dell'Accademia.png) are representations of Charles de Vintimille. Ecummenic (talk) 22:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Done: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Wrong name Wilfredor (talk) 22:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Done: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Can this category be renamed to Category:Decoration (disambiguation)? This is more clear. There are now 41 subcategories and 430 files in, while the category should be empty. JopkeB (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting a primary topic? Otherwise per w:WP:MALPLACED there is no need for "disambiguation" in the title. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Crouch, Swale, thanks for your reaction. No, I would not want to make this a primary topic. I just like to rename this category and remove all the subcategories and files to where they belong, to one of the categories named in this disambiguation category. I am afraid that when we just remove all the subcategories and files now and not rename the category, this category will fill up again in no time, because a lot of people do not see at once that this is a diambiguation category while they are categorizing files and subcategories. --JopkeB (talk) 15:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @JopkeB: DAB pages do not need "disambiguation" in the title (per W:WP:DABNAME) unless like Category:Brierley/Category:Brierley (disambiguation) there is a primary topic. The subcategories and files should be moved as appropriate but they will still be in this category (or the category redirect) if moved anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Crouch, Swale, I think there is a problem: people add categories to files and subcategories without looking into these categories. If they see Category:Decoration, they think this is the right one. Not just for this disambitation category but for many more, see Category:Non-empty disambiguation categories. I suggest a solution for this specific category, but apparently you do not agree. By the way the link W:WP:DABNAME is to Wikipedia, that does not need to be the same policy as in Commons. So, do you have another solution for this problem? Otherwise I'll rest my case and leave all the non-empty disambiguation categories as they are and put no more effort in them to get them right. --JopkeB (talk) 15:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- @JopkeB: Commons doesn't have a policy relating to disambiguation so we just follow Wikipedia's along with almost all projects that put DAB pages at the base name if possible. If someone adds a page to Category:Decoration with hotcat or links to it they will get a notification its a DAB or a list of options, that may not happen if the title without "disambiguation" redirects to the one with it. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, no on Commons you do not get a notification when you add a DAB to a file or category. The only way you can see it, is if you look very carefully whether the category you just added is indeed now correct in the file or category: then you see it is now in the part with the hidden categories. But only experienced editors see that. Because Commons is not only for experienced editors, I think we shoul resolve this problem. --JopkeB (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- @JopkeB: Commons doesn't have a policy relating to disambiguation so we just follow Wikipedia's along with almost all projects that put DAB pages at the base name if possible. If someone adds a page to Category:Decoration with hotcat or links to it they will get a notification its a DAB or a list of options, that may not happen if the title without "disambiguation" redirects to the one with it. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Crouch, Swale, I think there is a problem: people add categories to files and subcategories without looking into these categories. If they see Category:Decoration, they think this is the right one. Not just for this disambitation category but for many more, see Category:Non-empty disambiguation categories. I suggest a solution for this specific category, but apparently you do not agree. By the way the link W:WP:DABNAME is to Wikipedia, that does not need to be the same policy as in Commons. So, do you have another solution for this problem? Otherwise I'll rest my case and leave all the non-empty disambiguation categories as they are and put no more effort in them to get them right. --JopkeB (talk) 15:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Since no agreement nor a solution to the problem has been reached, I close this discussion whithout the proposed changes and I have taken this issue to a higher level, see Commons:Village pump#How to make a structural solution for not empty disambigious pages?. --JopkeB (talk) 06:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
bad name, but not sure what is best upper concept for these subcategories. Phrase "religion tradition" is massively used at Category:Religious tradition in Styria Estopedist1 (talk) 15:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Pero "religion Tradition" no. 191.126.140.218 18:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as Category:Religious traditions. I tested it with PONS: https://de.pons.com/%C3%BCbersetzung/deutsch-englisch/religi%C3%B6se+Traditionen?bidir=1
- "religiöse Traditionen" (german) ~ "religious traditions" (english) with many results in english texts
- See also other examples: Category:Religious rituals, Category:Religious places, Category:Religious events, ... "Religious ...", ..., "Religious traditions"
- So move to Category:Religious traditions in Austria
- And move all subcategories, for example in Category:Religious tradition in Styria to "Religious traditions in ..."
- Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 04:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories created anew are mainly filled with religious buildings and nothing else, e.g. Category:Religious tradition in Bezirk Bruck-Mürzzuschlag or Category:Religious tradition in Bezirk Murtal. So what is the difference to Category:Religion in Styria and subcats? Btw. Using the term religious tradition instead of religion for mainly buildings does not show much NPOV respect to religious people. Other country cats are filled with stuff like Easter, Christmas (i.e. rituals) etc, which is ok, but does not need per district subcategories. I would suggest to remove all the building categories from the Category:Religious Tradition in Austria tree. The content of these categories should be restricted to religious feasts and rituals. Move to Category:Religious traditions in Austria as other cats in Category:Religious traditions by country and delete the per district stuff. Calling @Iswoar: as the author of most of these cats. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Moved everything to schema Religious traditions in ...; removed buildings; clean cat / subcat structure; DRs for too detailed subcats on district level. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of Category:St Faith's, Gaywood WereSpielChequers (talk) 22:18, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Either delete, o write a redirect, manually, "{{category redirect|St Faith's, Gaywood}}".
- --Ulamm (talk) 07:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support the title with the apostrophe is correct. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Today, a bit more skilled, I'd have written the redirect, manually.--Ulamm (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Done: redirected. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Es un rapero? 191.125.27.152 23:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consci%C3%AAncia_Humana
Done: empty category. --Rosenzweig τ 19:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
These categories should be consistent. --Sahaib (talk) 12:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Most are in the form "Transport in X in the 2010s" so I've tagged those in the form "2010s in transport in X" for discussion. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
@Sahaib and Themightyquill: Any objection to setting "Transport in country in the decade" as the standard format and renaming subs as appropriate to match? Josh (talk) 20:48, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: , nope. Sahaib (talk) 21:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | Rename category | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Spam. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by WIKIYRI. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 16:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete DeloarAkram (talk) 06:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions |  Speedy delete of Category:Wikiyri | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 11:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Should Category:Chex ice hockey cards (NHL) be deleted/merged up to parent Category:Chex ice hockey cards? I see no evidence of Ralston Purina issuing any non-NHL cards. Is there something about 1960s ice hockey leagues I'm missing? (By contrast, not all Chex cards are Category:Ralston Purina ice hockey cards, because Commons also has the rare pet food cards from the same era.) Closeapple (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | Merge Category:Chex ice hockey cards (NHL) into Category:Chex ice hockey cards | |||
| Participants |
| |||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
can be deleted. There's the Category:Populated places in Santa Cruz Department instead. Grullab (talk) 08:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as is. The main category is at Category:Santa Cruz Department (Bolivia) because there was a en:Departamento_de_Santa_Cruz_(Chile). -- Themightyquill (talk) 18:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Both Populated places in Santa Cruz Department and Populated places in Santa Cruz Department (Bolivia) are redirects to Populated places in Santa Cruz Department, Bolivia since September 2022. Josh (talk) 11:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | No consensus | |||
| Actions | Keep | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 11:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Perhaps we needed to rename this cat because there is also a summer solstice parade in Santa Barbara, California A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- No objection. I'd say "Fremont Summer Solstice Parade". We should drop "and Pageant". I added that when they introduced what was supposed to become a permanent addition to the parade, but the pageant only lasted a couple of years. - Jmabel ! talk 15:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved by consensus | |||
| Actions | Rename Category:Summer Solstice Parade and Pageant to Category:Fremont Summer Solstice Parade | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 10:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Category to be deleted. I am the uploader. Wrong name. The right name is Category:Oil lamp with Germanicus funerary urn (Louvre, Cp 4900) Tangopaso (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | Delete Category:Oil lamp with Germanicus funerary urn (Louvre, Cp 4900 | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 10:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Category for deletion. Duplicate for Category:Nature of the Metropolitan Borough of Stockport which fits the naming for most Category: Nature by location. Malcolma (talk) 10:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | Done, retained redirect to deter duplication | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 10:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Moscow-Kursk Railway is a defunct railway in Russia since 1918 (see Московско-Курская железная дорога). According to the official scheme of Moscow Central Diameters it should be moved to Category:Kurskoye line or Category:Kurskoye line (Moscow Railway). Александр Мотин (talk) 14:04, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | Rename Category:Moscow-Kursk Railway to Category:Kurskoye line | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 10:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
I'm already not sure what Category:1 bridge would do, but why would we have subcategory tree for this? Enhancing999 (talk) 05:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep it's part of the whole category-tree, for example ...
- Category:Groups of 1
- Category:1 vehicle
- Category:1 organism
- Category:1 structure
- Category:1 bridge --> (keep) as all others with "1";
- (see Category:Bridges by quantity --> ... Category:1 bridge, Category:2 bridges, Category:3 bridges, Category:4 bridges, Category:5 bridges, ..., Category:Many bridges)
- Category:1 building
- Category:1 tunnel
- ...
- Category:Groups of 2
- Category:Groups of 3
- ...
- Category:Groups of 1
- Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 08:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- That may explain why there is Category:1 bridge, but the discussion here is about Category:1 bridge by country and its subcategories. Nothing in the above explains why you would need that. Enhancing999 (talk) 08:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: In 20+ years we have 80,000,000 pictures in Commons. In the last years, almost every person has a smartphone with camera, so the number of pictures will increase in the future. Expect the number of pictures only at the end of the 21st century... 1 billion?! So Category:1 bridge by country, 1/2/3 bridge/s by city/cities (of these countries) ... will give the space to sort these and future pictures. The Category-by-country-sorting is common for all topics where there are already many pictures in all countries or where many pictures can be expected in the future. My motto is better to create the correct sorting sooner than later. Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 09:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- That may explain why there is Category:1 bridge, but the discussion here is about Category:1 bridge by country and its subcategories. Nothing in the above explains why you would need that. Enhancing999 (talk) 08:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: By the way:
- Category:Groups of 1 by country
- Category:1 vehicle by country
- Category:1 organism by country
- Category:1 structure by country
- Category:1 bridge by country --> (keep) as all others with " by country"
- Category:1 building by country
- Category:1 tunnel by country
- ...
- Category:Groups of 2 by country
- Category:Groups of 3 by country
- ...
- Category:Groups of 1 by country
- Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 09:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think space is an issue, beyond that, you haven't explained why you consider that correct sorting.
- We already have "bridges by country", so we don't need "1 bridge by country".
- At least, this time, you added your keep vote to the correct category. It's possible that some of the other categories created empty aren't needed either, but that would be a different discussion. --- Enhancing999 (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think I explained it because there are countless pictures with 1 bridge. If one does not divide by country and other administrative units, the main categories will be hopelessly overcrowded. I don't understand what you want to improve. Abolishing this sorting would sooner or later hopelessly overcrowd the main categories.
- And no, the other categories aren't created empty as you suppose here. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 10:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Enhancing999: By the way:
- Keep I won't even comment on the content, but "by country" is a common way to avoid full categories. Like "by color", "by type", "by shape", ... --XRay 💬 13:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The main reasons have already been mentioned. It is absurd to take action against the entire category tree. --Geoprofi Lars (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment As mentioned before, most of the categories filled-in by the creator above aren't concerned and are different in nature. Enhancing999 (talk) 09:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's not true. the categories I mentioned as examples are all by quantity by country. you have to keep in mind that this discussion you have initiated here concerns the entire similar existing system. And your goals are not clear to anyone here. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 20:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to re-read your post from "08:26, 28 June 2022". Enhancing999 (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- You might re-read my post from "09:41", 28 June 2022. ... after you didn't seem to understand the first one and needed more detailed explanations with the addition "by country"... and you have not yet presented any meaningful arguments why this should be changed/deleted ... the "by country"-categories are commonly used in all other areas, the categorization "by country" - if there are several images per country or several images can be expected in the future - is usually. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- You created the whole category tree Category:Groups of 1 by country just recently. There has been no large discussion with a clear consensus about these categories, so it is perfectly fine to question whether we need this category tree as a whole at all. --PhiH (talk) 11:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- While categories for 2 can be useful, I still don't see it for "1 bridge by country".
- What do prolific contributors of bridge images think of it? @Jag9889, @Pechristener Enhancing999 (talk) 15:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Don't see any benefit by using this category, it's rather confusing and duplicate to me. Jag9889 (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is a benefit. It makes sense to separate the Category:Categories by quantity from 1, ... to many by country, because the main categories will fill up over time. Since there are several hundred countries, a categorization "by country" makes sense, otherwise there would be hundreds of entries in the main category. This is handled in every subject area of Commons to categorize "by country". It's the same here. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 13:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep anro (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is a benefit. It makes sense to separate the Category:Categories by quantity from 1, ... to many by country, because the main categories will fill up over time. Since there are several hundred countries, a categorization "by country" makes sense, otherwise there would be hundreds of entries in the main category. This is handled in every subject area of Commons to categorize "by country". It's the same here.
- Don't see any benefit by using this category, it's rather confusing and duplicate to me. Jag9889 (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to re-read your post from "08:26, 28 June 2022". Enhancing999 (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's not true. the categories I mentioned as examples are all by quantity by country. you have to keep in mind that this discussion you have initiated here concerns the entire similar existing system. And your goals are not clear to anyone here. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 20:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment can we avoid voting multiple times on random categories on this page? Enhancing999 (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep --W-R-Hesse-Fotos (talk) 17:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep --Laserlicht (talk) 22:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As others have pointed out, this category tree will eventually become almost a duplicate of categories such as Category:Bridges by country. Categories like these might make sense in contexts where mutiple objects of the same type are regularly depicted in one image, e. g. for animals. The vast majority of images with bridges have exactly one bridge as the primary object. I don't think that there will be many people looking for an image with exactly one bridge on it and won't be satisfied with images in the general categories. --PhiH (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Could not agree more, it just does not make any sense to add a Category by quantity for BRIDGES Jag9889 (talk) 15:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep While clearly some users see no benefit to this category structure, there are others who do find value in it. Since the structure complies with the basic principles for categories and a number of users value it, there is no reason left to delete it. Josh (talk) 05:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | No consensus | |||
| Actions | none (stale discussion) | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
I want know common name of this species so.... 2400:1A00:B111:CBF8:1D48:9B88:4CAD:1D01 03:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, for common names of this plant, please see Tropicos: Acmella radicans. Usually, such links can be found on Wikispecies or on Wikidata. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |  No proposal | |||
| Actions | none | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 10:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Sports by country by year x Category:Sports by year by country (wrong category content) Zelenymuzik (talk) 09:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry. Can you please explain where is the problem ? Thank you. --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Zelenymuzik: No. For neo-latin speaking people (italian, french, spanish) "Sportspeople by country in 1872" is "Sportspeople by country by year". For english speaking people it's "Sportspeople by year by country" (reverted form). Now Commons is an international project and his official language is english. So we have to apply the english form. About 10 years ago we were forced for the italian categories to change all the categories names to the english form. Can somebody that speaks english confirm that ? Thank you. --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DenghiùComm: It doesn't even match the English wikipedia category. Zelenymuzik (talk) 10:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Zelenymuzik: No. For neo-latin speaking people (italian, french, spanish) "Sportspeople by country in 1872" is "Sportspeople by country by year". For english speaking people it's "Sportspeople by year by country" (reverted form). Now Commons is an international project and his official language is english. So we have to apply the english form. About 10 years ago we were forced for the italian categories to change all the categories names to the english form. Can somebody that speaks english confirm that ? Thank you. --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
@Zelenymuzik and DenghiùComm: Closed (subsumed into Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/06/Category:Sports by country by year) Josh (talk) 11:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand the purpose of this category. It doesn't fit well with Category:People by activity and we don't have Category:People by function. Isn't it redundant with Category:Military occupations? -- Themightyquill (talk) 07:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and upmerge contents back to Category:Military people (they can be properly sorted from there). People do not have functions (within our category scheme)--they have occupations, hold positions/offices, and participate in activities. Josh (talk) 11:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and upmerge. - Jmabel ! talk 15:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Themightyquill (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
redundant category layer. Unique country subcategory also to be deleted. I removed its only entry Category:Kyndby Kirke Estopedist1 (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Done: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
same subject as Category:Brug 808, Lex van Deldenbrug Paulbe (talk) 10:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Then just make it into a redirect. It's a reasonable alternate name (which is why I created it - per Wanted Categories, there were several images in it). DS (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Redirected to Category:Brug 808, Lex van Deldenbrug. (non-admin closure) --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
This category started dealing with a specific memorial hall. Instead of just moving it to an appropriate name, a disambiguation without any entries was created. I suggest to delete it: "Category:Memorial halls" is perfect for navigation, and I doubt than anybody is willing to keep this disambiguation up-to-date (I am not). Telford (talk) 11:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to "Category:Memorial halls"? Otherwise it might just get recreated and used for a specific one. Enhancing999 (talk) 23:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- There is a DAB page on Wikipedia but it may indeed be easier to find then through the generic Category:Memorial halls depending on how many are commonly called just "Memorial Hall". Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, one gets a list of halls by clicking on the link provided on the page: Special:Categories/Memorial_Hall. Enhancing999 (talk) 18:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguate category and populate. This is what dabs are for. Josh (talk) 10:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
As this category has been created more than 8 years ago and never has been used as disambiguation, I followed Enhancing999's suggestion and created a redirect. --Telford (talk) 06:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
There seems to be a lot of overlap between this category, Category:Postal history, and Category:Post. It would help if the differences were either clarified or the redundancy is gotten rid of. Personally, my money is on getting rid of this category and Category:Postal history (or at least Category:Postal history) since both are uncommon phrases that are to general to be useful, but I'd like other opinions. Adamant1 (talk) 00:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Google reports over 7 million hits on "philately", so not really that obscure. There should not be any overlap. Philately should be postage stamps specifically, both present and past, postal history should be postal operations of the past only, and "Post" is the umbrella that includes everything. Postal history is often characterized as a specialization within philately, but that's an accident of timing as much as anything; there could have been postal historians before the invention of stamps, had anyone thought to take an interest at the time. For wikipedia purposes, I think philately and postal history would work better as sibling categories rather than trying to decide which is "in" the other. Stan Shebs (talk) 01:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- OK, pondering a bit more, there is some messiness introduced by things like revenue stamps. While most revenue stamps have nothing to do with the postal system, there are plenty of "postage and revenue" stamps, plus the mechanics of revenues overlap considerably with postage stamps. (In some rounds of categorization, I deliberately chose unqualified "stamp" so that postage and revenue did not have to be in artificially-separate categories.) Looking at the current system, revenues should probably go up to Category:paper products. Stan Shebs (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I meant obscure as far as being a general word to describe whatever is in the category. 99% of the files in it and the subcategories aren't about the study of postal history, and don't use the term "philately" in their descriptions or anywhere else. Most of the population hasn't heard of and doesn't use the term either. At least not outside of specialist stamp collecting magazines. In the meantime category names aren't based on the number of Google hits a word gets, but they are based on common parlance. Which "post" is the clear winner of (20,160,000,000 Google hits!).
- Outside of that, there is overlap or I wouldn't have said there was. Like stamps are in both Category:Philately and Category:Post. Category:Postal history is in Category:Post and contains Category:Philately. Category:Rocket mail is in Category:Postal history and also Category:Airmail, which is in Category:Philately. Category:Postal stationery is in both Category:Philately and Category:Post Etc. Etc. So there is a lot of overlap. "Should" there be any? Probably not, but users clearly don't know the difference between the three categories, if there even is any. I'm not really convinced there is. Especially not going by what you've said. For instance, your statement "Philately should be postage stamps specifically, both present and past" is nonsensical because stamps of the past, which is 99% of the stamps hosted on Commons BTW, can go in both Category:Philately and Category:Postal history. So one of them is redundant. Ultimately if philately is the "study of stamps and postal history" then Category:Postal history must be pointless because the purpose of philately is literally the study of postal history. Or Category:Philately is. You can't have it both ways though. Personally, I rather not endlessly argue about semantics, what qualifies as historical, or anything else and just split the difference at Category:Post. Since it doesn't have the inherent ambiguity that the other two categories have. Ultimately there's zero reason why a category like Category:Postage stamps can't just go in Category:Post, and even less for why it needs to be in all three categories. Or alternatively I guess we could just debate the difference between "the study of postal history" and "postal history" ad nauseum. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- OK, mea culpa, I thought this was about en:, not commons! (Realized when I couldn't find this discussion again after noodling around en: categories...) That changes things a bit, although the principles are the same I think. So to borrow from Category:Animals and Category:Zoology, animals are the "things" while "zoology" is the study of those things, so a picture of a bird goes under the animals tree, while a picture of a person looking at birds through binoculars is more "zoology". If we like that reasoning, then most pictures of objects will be under "stamps", "covers", "postmarks", etc, leaving "philately" with maybe some diagrams, pictures of perf gauges, and "postal history" with some route maps maybe? I do agree that the current situation is too tangled, it's like people use categorization to mean "tangentially-related". :-)
- So I would be good with moving a bunch of pictures-of-objects categories up, and then wordsmithing the descriptions of the categories so people will know which are "X" and which are "study of X". Stan Shebs (talk) 03:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- No worries. It happens. I confuse the two myself sometimes. That sounds fine as long as it stays organized that way. I'll leave this up for a longer in case someone else wants to comment about it before I change things (really superficially) though. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Outside of that, there is overlap or I wouldn't have said there was. Like stamps are in both Category:Philately and Category:Post. Category:Postal history is in Category:Post and contains Category:Philately. Category:Rocket mail is in Category:Postal history and also Category:Airmail, which is in Category:Philately. Category:Postal stationery is in both Category:Philately and Category:Post Etc. Etc. So there is a lot of overlap. "Should" there be any? Probably not, but users clearly don't know the difference between the three categories, if there even is any. I'm not really convinced there is. Especially not going by what you've said. For instance, your statement "Philately should be postage stamps specifically, both present and past" is nonsensical because stamps of the past, which is 99% of the stamps hosted on Commons BTW, can go in both Category:Philately and Category:Postal history. So one of them is redundant. Ultimately if philately is the "study of stamps and postal history" then Category:Postal history must be pointless because the purpose of philately is literally the study of postal history. Or Category:Philately is. You can't have it both ways though. Personally, I rather not endlessly argue about semantics, what qualifies as historical, or anything else and just split the difference at Category:Post. Since it doesn't have the inherent ambiguity that the other two categories have. Ultimately there's zero reason why a category like Category:Postage stamps can't just go in Category:Post, and even less for why it needs to be in all three categories. Or alternatively I guess we could just debate the difference between "the study of postal history" and "postal history" ad nauseum. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
My take:
- "Post of [country X]" would seem to be to be a good top level (ideally consistently under "Communication in [country X]," "Transport in [country X]," and "Public services of [country X]," but I'm not going to hazard a guess how consistently those would be implemented across countries).
- I'd sure like to see "Postage stamps of [country X]" as the next level down. That would also allow a separate "Stamps of [country X]" as a parent for that, for countries that also use stamps for other purposes. (As for potential confusion with ink stamps, we already have a Category:Ink stamps, and Category:Stamps links to it appropriately.)
- I'd save the "Philately of [country X]" category for the actual activity of philately, objects used by philatelists, etc. If people want it under "Post of [country X]" I wouldn't object, but I would object to hiding "Postage stamps of [country X]" under "Philately of [country X]". I'd rather see an exception allowing an overcat, if it comes to that, because I think a lot more people will look for postage stamps than for philately, and plenty of them would never think to look under "philately" to find stamps.
- As for "Postal history of [country X]" I feel pretty much the same way as about "Philately". Should be under both "Post of [country X]" and "History of [country X]"; perfectly OK to put "Postage stamps of [country X]" under it as long as we allow that to be an overcat. For most countries, I wouldn't mind losing "postal history" entirely and just putting its potential subcats in both "Post of [country X]" and "History of [country X]", but if you look at (for example) Category:Postal history of the United Kingdom or Category:Postal history of the United States there is an awful lot there not to group it together (although I think some of what is there for the latter might be dubious: why 3 categories at this level dealing with the Pony Express?).
Anyway: I don't have a lot of stake in this, and I think any consistent scheme is probably better than no consistent scheme.
User:A.Savin in the COM:ANU discussion that brought me here seemed to be much more invested in this than I am; I'm surprised he hasn't commented, and would very much invite him to do so. I won't be weighing in again unless someone specifically asks me to, because I think I've said my piece. Jmabel ! talk 21:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not a postal expert, so I'm willing to listen to what those who know more about it than me, but I generally agree with Jmabel's suggestions, especially with allowing "Postage Stamps of X" in addition to "Philately of X". Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Jmabel suggestions look good. -- Ooligan (talk) 18:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments. I'm totally fine with implementing Jmabel's suggestions. Including allowing for "Postage Stamps of X" categories in addition to "Philately of X." It would probably be a good idea to axe the whole "postal history of X" thing at some point since it seems super redundant but I'll leave that for another time and discussion. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with Jmabel's suggestions on this. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions |
| |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | --Adamant1 (talk) 13:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Adamant1 (talk) 13:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Move to Category:Roads and streets named Kyiv to match parent and peers. -- Themightyquill (talk) 07:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: Why are these categories named "roads and streets"? Isn't a street a type of road? Isn't this like the argument we had a while back to change "Buildings and structures" to just one or the other? The argument was that saying "buildings and structures" (and in this case, "roads and streets") is like saying "carrots and vegetables". --Auntof6 (talk) 07:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might be right. I suspect the concern was that we end up with both (e.g. Category:Roads named after Kyiv and subcategory Category:Streets named after Kyiv with just one or two entries each? We do have Category:Streets by name but no Category:Roads by name for some reason. Category:Roads and streets dates back to 2013. -- Themightyquill (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Auntof6, since the category "Streets" accommodates address-forming objects and a "road" (as an address-forming object) is one of such objects. And if we consider a "road" not as an address-forming object then it will be "carrots and vegetables".--Александр Мотин (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might be right. I suspect the concern was that we end up with both (e.g. Category:Roads named after Kyiv and subcategory Category:Streets named after Kyiv with just one or two entries each? We do have Category:Streets by name but no Category:Roads by name for some reason. Category:Roads and streets dates back to 2013. -- Themightyquill (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- From Russian Wikipedia:
--Александр Мотин (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- That should be the other way around. Streets should be under roads. -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: it is correct because "road" means "doroga" (passage) here as the element of address (e.g. Torfyanaya Doroga). But the category should be named more accurate, e.g. Category:Dorogas in Saint Petersburg, in order to resolve ambiguity. --Александр Мотин (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Александр Мотин: Maybe so, but I think it should be decided according to the usual meaning of road and street here in Commons. If there is a different usage in Russia (or elsewhere), maybe the categories should be named with a transliteration of the terms from the relevant language (for example, "Dorogas in Saint Petersburg" instead of roads or streets). The usual Commons usage has nothing to do with whether the thing is used to form addresses; both roads and streets can have addresses. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am okay with either roads under streets or streets under roads, but opposed to 'streets and roads'. Of course, this should be decided for roads/streets at large, not just for this particular category. Josh (talk) 11:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have tagged Category:Roads and streets with this CfD. I suggest we merge Category:Roads and streets into either Category:Roads or Category:Streets while the other of the two becomes a sub-category of the other. Josh (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- That sounds good. I would merge it into roads, because I think we categorize streets under roads. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. Streets should be a sub-category of roads. In the United States history, there were "trails" that developed into "wilderness roads" or rural roads. Streets are predominantly urban. There were wilderness trails and rural roads, before urban areas with roads and streets. @Auntof6, @Joshbaumgartner, @Themightyquill, @Александр Мотин Ooligan (talk) 16:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- That sounds good. I would merge it into roads, because I think we categorize streets under roads. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Александр Мотин: Maybe so, but I think it should be decided according to the usual meaning of road and street here in Commons. If there is a different usage in Russia (or elsewhere), maybe the categories should be named with a transliteration of the terms from the relevant language (for example, "Dorogas in Saint Petersburg" instead of roads or streets). The usual Commons usage has nothing to do with whether the thing is used to form addresses; both roads and streets can have addresses. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: it is correct because "road" means "doroga" (passage) here as the element of address (e.g. Torfyanaya Doroga). But the category should be named more accurate, e.g. Category:Dorogas in Saint Petersburg, in order to resolve ambiguity. --Александр Мотин (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Roads and streets has been merged to Roads. Overturned by Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2023/11#Roads_and_streets. "Dorogas" should be used for Saint Petersburg instead of "roads". --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 09:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
User:YiFeiBot no longer checked this, and for the admins they should check every file's history before deleting them, so I don't think this category is necessary A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Still in use, see Special:Diff/735012790. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Updated admin-only link: [1]. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: YiFeiBot added File:Stealth Fiber Crew installing fiber cable underneath the streets of Manhattan.jpg to the category today, so I think it's still useful. --bjh21 (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=File%3A125063-125063-%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%84+%281%29.jpg×tamp=20230223082254&diff=prev){kind=link}
Not done: I'm involved, but this will languish forever, and I think it's sufficently clear that the nomination's premise is now mistaken. A1Cafel or anyone else is welcome to ask for this to be reopened on my talk. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I would like to move this category to Category:Nos. 301 & 303 Castle Peak Road for the sake of consistency, but I have already created Category:Nos. 301 & 303 Castle Peak Road by mistake (and subsequently turned it into a redirect). Would it be possible to delete Category:Nos. 301 & 303 Castle Peak Road to allow the move? Thanks Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 04:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- I finally performed the move myself. I am the only contributor involved + no comment after 1 month. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Actually not the only contributor involved. There is another one. But the move is most most likely uncontroversial. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Done: already done. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to move the category Category:301 & 303 Castle Peak Road here for the sake of consistency, but I have already created this category Category:Nos. 301 & 303 Castle Peak Road by mistake (and subsequently turned it into a redirect). Would it be possible to delete Category:Nos. 301 & 303 Castle Peak Road to allow the move? Thanks. Note: similar request posted at Category:301 & 303 Castle Peak Road. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 04:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- I finally performed the move myself. I am the only contributor involved + no comment after 1 month. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Done: category already been moved, no need to delete redirect. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
To be deleted because too specific, badly named, unique country category Estopedist1 (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Done: category deleted. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of category:Saint Hilda Church (Egton) WereSpielChequers (talk) 06:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Its been redirected but the correct title would probably be Category:St Hilda's Church, Egton. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Done: already redirected. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Normally orphaned talk pages are speedy deleted under COM:CSD#G8. If they have some reasons to keep, "Category:Commons orphaned talk pages that should not be speedily deleted" is enough. No need to create another category A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#C2. Michalg95 (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Done: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
unique country category. To be merged into category:Church porches in Finland Estopedist1 (talk) 10:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- There are now Category:Church porch interiors in Sweden and Category:Church porch interiors, no need to remove/merge for the given reason. Niera (talk) 16:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done: other country categories now. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Despite being framed as a useful category the content is nothing but single-user exhibitionism Dronebogus (talk) 03:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- I removed the nude images, now the category has images that are relevant to the topic. Léna (talk) 08:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: per Léna. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
There are some naming inconsistencies in the category tree, with "Serif+sans" used in the names of subcategories. While these were mostly created by me, I'm pretty sure I named them this way to maintain the style of Category:Serif+sans Greek letters (created by Imz back in 2009). I suggest that all cats should use the more conventional "Serifed vs sans-serif" though. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Question@1234qwer1234qwer4: I think you are best positioned to go ahead and make the changes. Since there are no objections to your proposal, if I close this CfD, would you be able to make the changes? Josh (talk) 11:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure I'm interested in doing that currently, sorry. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- This has been done... I close this Cfd. verdy_p (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure I'm interested in doing that currently, sorry. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Done: already been done. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Per English WP the correct naming is w:Yakimanka District. Should be moved to Category:Streets in Yakimanka District. Александр Мотин (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as parent is Yakimanka. If that needs to change, propose a CfD at that level. Josh (talk) 11:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Not done: per discussion. Consistent with parent category. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Empty and currently useless. All files were removed from it because they were replicas, not actual film props. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and Trout. It was only empty because you removed the content. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&diff=668009217&oldid=657502058){kind=link}
Not done: not empty. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Move to Category:Roads and streets named after subdivisions to match parent category and avoid using "etc." in category name. -- Themightyquill (talk) 08:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. Provided that nobody mistakes this shortening of "country subdivisions" to mean instead subdivisions of something else, of course. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Category:Subdivisions also includes supranational regions, allowing for something like Category:Roads and streets named after Pomerania. But we could definitely have Category:Roads and streets named after country subdivisions (and Category:Things named after country subdivisions). - Themightyquill (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
On hold pending resolution of the discussion on this matter going on at Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/06/Category:Streets named after Kyiv. Josh (talk) 11:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved by consensus | |||
| Actions | Rename to Category:Roads after country subdivisions. | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 13:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||